After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies have become reviving these systems. Via lie detection tools analyzed at the border to a system for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of solutions is being utilized in asylum applications. This article explores just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with capricious tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their particular capacity to get around these devices and to follow their legal right for proper protection.
It also illustrates how these technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‚circuits of financial-humanitarianism‘ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers‘ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering all of them from getting at the programs of safeguards. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight into the disciplinary www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-consultation/ mechanisms for these technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects so, who are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double effect: even though they aid to expedite the asylum procedure, they also produce it difficult to get refugees to navigate these systems. They are really positioned in a ‚knowledge deficit‘ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions of non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes‘ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.